Sunday, November 27, 2011

Fecal Transplants... Yes They Are Exactly What You're Thinking



There are a few problems that arise when taking antibiotics, one of the more detrimental ones is getting infected by Clostridium difficile. Before going into detail about C. difficile, let me explain one aspect in which intestines work. They contain friendly bacteria that maintain a “seesaw balance” which prevents pathogenic bacteria from causing infections. When we take antibiotics this delicate balance is disrupted and thrown out of whack, but this side affect is only temporary as the balance is restored. However, in some cases of taking antibiotics, this delicate balance is disrupted permanently. Antibiotics can cause the good bacterial communities in your intestines to lose their ability to return to normality when disturbed, and may even cause friendly bacteria to die. When this occurs, the organism C. difficile is able to take over and eat away at the inner lining of one’s intestines. The result is painful chronic diarrhea

As of right now, the common treatment is to take more antibiotics, such as metronidazole or vancomycin, which will suppress C. difficile. Initially these antibiotics will succeed as the diarrhea will go away, however the antibiotics are ineffective as they are unable to suppress all of the C. difficile and therefore the chronic diarrhea will recur. Due to failure after failure with antibiotics, many patients are willing to try anything to cure themselves of C. difficile, which brings us to fecal transplants. Yes, it is exactly what you think. Another person’s stool is injected into you. To go just a little more in depth with the procedure, the donors stool is grinded up and then filtered to remove any solid materials. From there, the stool is placed in a sterile saline solution. Once suspended, the solution is injected into the patient’s colon. The reason why this procedure works is because the bacteria found in the stool is able to take over the gut and outcompete the C. difficile. Thus the transplanted bacteria is able to restore the body’s natural health. The success rate of the treatment is uncanny as over 90% of patients whom received fecal transplants have recovered completely. However, one problem stands in the way of fecal transplants, the FDA.

To be studied by the NIH, the substance being studied must be granted investigational status by the FDA. This poses a problem as feces do not fall in the realm of the major categories studied by the FDA. This problem may prevent fecal transplants from becoming a common procedure. If the FDA does not grant fecal transplants permissions to be studied then I fell blood transfusions should not occur either. I say this because one’s blood also does not fall in the realm of major FDA categories, but yet blood transfusions are common. Like blood transfusions, donors of fecal transplants go through tests to ensure that they are healthy and to prevent any complications from occurring. Also, you cannot deny the success rate of fecal transplants as over 90% of patients have recovered completely. Even animals perform a similar action as dogs, pigs, elephants, gorillas, rabbits, hamsters and many more animals practice coprophagia, the consumption of feces. For many the reason is unknown but one would not be surprised if it was to maintain their intestines. I feel as though a simple test can be done to show the affects of fecal transplants. Once this is done, it should become a common procedure. If anyone disagrees, please do tell why.

7 comments:

  1. Well, Usman, this is a very disgusting procedure. But, actually, as I think about it, I can't find anything wrong with it. Except for, wouldn't there be a safer and way cleaner way to get these good bacteria?"

    ReplyDelete
  2. How is it not safe Ralph? As long as the fecal matter is injected in the colon and does not get out then you are fine. Also, antibiotics have failed ralph. How is it not clean? I mean yes it is human waste but It is medicine, I am sure one may see far worse things.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I didn't say it wasn't safe, I said is there a safer way. Basically, the point of the procedure is to get good bacteria into your colon right? So is there any way that you can get them without resorting to crap (literally)?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hmm well I feel like there may be but there is no evidence to indicate that seeing how this procedure has become popular and may become a standard operation. I feel like the only problem of getting it passed by the FDA would be the "ick" factor of the situation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. http://www.livestrong.com/article/310058-how-to-replenish-good-bacteria/
    This site has some but the article in Scientific American talked about a patient suffering form the C.diff virus and the doctor was at a loss for solutions after a long period of time so I am guessing these things just help the situation but not cure it

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh I see. So as of right now, there's nothing as comprehensive as the procedure. As far as I can tell, it does the same thing as the medication does, just better. I guess there's no better source for it. Speaking of which, how much do you need to make it effective. The way I'm looking at it it that the procedure is more natural, so the source has more good bacteria and a wider variety, which is why it's better than meds. So how much do you need for it to be effective.

    ReplyDelete
  7. No it does much more than the medication. The antibiotics that patients were taking would work initially but strands of the C.diff virus will remain alive and therefore after a few days the chronic diarrhea would return. It was pretty much a never ending cycle for most patients and some people lasted years with it, now it goes away in probably a day if not less when performing fecal transplants.
    I have not found an exact amount but my guess is enough so that the good bacteria will out compete the C.diif virus

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.