Could
the Loch Ness Monster exist and could it be a Plesiosaur?
By
Bobby Gardineer
Well, first what is a Plesiosaur? The
Plesiosaur existed on Earth between 220 million years ago at the end of the
Triassic period until the end of the Cretaceous period 65 million years ago. It
was a reptile that swam in the ocean. It had a long neck, four flippers, and a
short tail. We know this because fossils of these creatures have been found on
every continent on the planet. But because of the variety of different fossils
that were found the Plesiosaur had to be classified into two types. The first
type is the long-necks with small heads and the second type is the short-necks
with large-heads. How weird is that? It sounds to me like the Plesiosaur
changed and evolved over those millions of years and scientists just don’t have
enough information to make an accurate classification of each version of the
creature.
It
is believed that the Plesiosaur hunted in warm shallow coastal waters and may
have lived there too. This belief is based on the fact that many of the fossils
were found in those regions. Now some of the Plesiosaur fossils were preserved
well enough to show stomach contents. By looking at the contents a
determination might be made about what they ate. From what was found it seemed
that the creature ate a wide range of foods. Some remains showed they ate
belemnites and ammonites while others showed they were carnivorous. Scientists
believe that the creature adapted to whatever food source was available. To me
that would explain why it existed for 155 million years.
Now onto the important question:
Does the Loch Ness Monster exist?
Let’s first look at some history of
the monster. The first recorded sighting of the Loch Ness Monster was in 565 AD
by St Columba who said he saw a water beast attacking one of his followers. There
aren’t any additional sightings again until 1933. One of the sightings in 1933 was
by a Mr. and Mrs. Spicer who reported seeing a large animal crossing the road
in front of their car.
Since that time, there have been a
number of sightings and claims by individuals that said they saw a creature.
There have been reports of a single hump creature, a double hump creature, and
sightings on land and in the water.
(The Loch Ness Monster as described
in a 1930s sighting.)
(1934 surgeon's photograph)
(Loch Ness)
There are many people who believe
that something exists in the Loch but there is currently no real proof that
there does.
So if it does exist could it be a Plesiosaur?
According to www.loch-ness.org the most
popular belief is that it is. So is it possible that a species that went
extinct 65 million years ago survived to become the Lock Ness Monster? To know
if it is possible we will have to look at what the loch environment was like
over the last 65 million years. Then we would have to figure out how it came to
live in the Loch.
Well
I have no information from 65 Million years ago until about 12,000 years ago. But
it is believed that some 12,000 years ago Loch Ness was solid ice because the
region was experiencing an ice age. So no animals, including the plesiosaurs, could
have lived through it. If plesiosaurs came into the loch it would have had to
happen after the ice melted and plants recovered from the ice age. That would
mean that these creatures were living in the North Sea (a lot of them) for at
least some of them to become trapped in the loch. If there were a lot of them
in the North Sea only a few thousand years ago where are they now?
Also,
why would plesiosaurs come to a barren loch (after the ice age) with no fish or
animals to feed on? And lastly, the plesiosaur is believed to have lived in warm
shallow seas so it seems unlikely that it could have survived in ice age seas. So
It is believed by some (who look at the facts) that these conclusions rule out
the plesiosaur of being the Loch Ness Monster. I am one of the believers.
The water at depth is warmer, is it possible that it could live down deeper and survive in this warmer water?
ReplyDeleteits a possibility but isn't water warmer near the surface?
ReplyDelete